Paste a prompt, see tokens and cost on GPT, Claude, Gemini, Qwen, DeepSeek — then compare two models
| Model | Tokens | Input | Output | One request | All requests | Context | Fits? |
|---|
Large language models are billed by the token, a small chunk of text roughly three-quarters of an English word. Providers charge separately for the tokens you send (input) and the tokens the model writes back (output), and output is usually several times more expensive, so a short question with a long answer can cost more than a long document with a short summary.
Price is only one axis when choosing a model. The context window sets how much text the model can consider at once, from around one hundred thousand tokens to a million or more; speed decides whether a chat feels instant; and multimodal models can also read images, listen to audio or watch video. Cheap fast models suit classification, extraction and high-volume chat, while flagship and reasoning models are worth their price on hard coding, analysis and planning tasks.
Comparing GPT, Claude, Gemini, Qwen, DeepSeek, Grok and Llama-class models side by side makes trade-offs visible before a project scales: multiply the per-request cost by your monthly volume and a tenfold price gap becomes a real budget line. Open-weight models add another option, since they can be run on your own hardware or through several competing hosts.